zondag 23 april 2017

Statism - Het gevaarlijkste geloof ter wereld!

Er zijn mensen die vandaag de dag claimen dat Islam het gevaarlijkste geloof ter wereld is. Anderen zullen daar tegenin brengen dat het Katholieke geloof ook talloze doden ten gevolg heeft gehad. Weer anderen zullen er dan op wijzen dat Hitler, Mao en Pol Pot niet gelovig waren en voor de meeste doden hebben gezorgd.

Wat bijna iedereen vergeet is dat we het geloof in de staat allemaal voor lief nemen. Het wordt er bij kinderen met de paplepel ingegoten en mensen die er laten tegenin willen gaan "verdienen" hun straf. Het is dan ook exact dit geloof, het geloof in de staat, wat het meest gevaarlijke geloof ter wereld is en de meeste doden op z'n conto mag schrijven.

En ondanks dat dit geen geheime occulte informatie betreft gaat dit zo hard in tegen wat mensen vanaf kleins af aan ingeprent krijgen dat de logica en rationaliteit niet voldoende is hen dit in te laten zien. Bekijk de volgende korte video van Larken Rose maar eens en als je er inhoudelijk iets tegenin te brengen hebt dan verneem ik dat graag. Ik ben bang dat niemand dit lukt met valide argumenten...

En toch... Als de plicht roept snelt iedereen weer naar het stemhokje, want men gelooft in de staat!

zaterdag 15 april 2017

The Syria Strikes: A Conspiracy Theory

James Corbett heeft weer een geweldige video online gezet van minder dan 5 minuten, waarin door middel van satire, pijnlijk duidelijk wordt hoe absurd de explosieve situatie rondom het conflict in Syrië is. Het gaat razendsnel en zit tjokvol informatie zodat het wellicht gaat duizelen voor je ogen. Maar niet gevreesd want de gehele tekst en de bronnen om zijn verhaal te onderbouwen worden zoals gewoonlijk weer meegeleverd.

Het is gewoon een herhaling van de aanloop naar de oorlog met Irak in 2003. Leugens en propaganda voeren de boventoon en rationaliteit wordt weggezet als steun voor de dictator Assad en complotdenken. Ik zou in dat kader graag George W. Bush willen citeren:

“There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again.”

Informeer jezelf en zorg ervoor dat het niet je onderbuik maar je hersenpan is die je laat spreken.

Ik wens tijdens dit paasweekend iedereen enorm veel wijsheid toe!

Transcript en bronnen:

On the morning of April 4th 2017, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, on the verge of a military victory against the terrorist insurgency in his country and on the eve of peace talks that would secure his position as president, decided to use chemical weapons he didn’t have against a target of no military significance in front of as many cameras as possible to cross the one red line that would insure his own government’s downfall.

Soon after, the Academy Award-winning White Helmets–noted for their Oscar-worthy performances, persistent proximity to Al Qaeda, and financial dependence on USAID–bravely risked their lives, handling Sarin victims barehanded against every protocol in the book.

Without presenting a shred of evidence, President Donald Trump boldly launched a military strike against Shayrat airfield because “national security interest,” promising to help the “beautiful children” (*offer does not apply to babies in Gaza, Yemen, Pakistan, or basically anywhere else).

That military strike, a volley of 59 Tomahawk land attack missiles of which 23 actually made it to their target, failed to take out a single runway or even keep the airbase from operating for even 24 hours, but was a complete success for ExxonMobil, Raytheon and Donald Trump.

No one could question the wisdom of striking Syria (except Donald Trump). And no one could oppose such a move (except Russia).

The Trump Train, still convinced by candidate Trump (“dropping bombs on Assad” and “look what happened after Gaddafi“)  concluded that this was 7th dimensional backgammon to make China afraid of the US’ willingness to spend $100 million in a fearsome show of failing to destroy a single airfield.

Throughout the world people rejoice as a horrible secular regime in the Middle East is replaced by yet another peace-loving band of ragtag human rights campaigners and child beheaders motivated by a desire to subdue the armies of Rome in an apocalyptic confrontation in Dabiq. (*actual ISIS belief)
The chemicals for the previous “red line” attack in Syria have since been proven to come from Libya with US approval, but that’s probably not relevant to this case.

The CIA has released declassified report after declassified report showing that the plan to topple Syria’s government has been in the works for decades, but this just shows that they were right all along.

The mainstream media unquestioningly asserts that the story is true because the US government says so, but that’s OK because we all know the msm is full of unbiased truthtellers and dig hard to get the raw facts on every story. (“beauty of our weapons“)

Even members of congress think the story is a load of hogwash, but that’s OK because they’re probably crazy.

Meanwhile the White House has released a report on its intelligence about the chemical attack that refutes its own version of the story, but that’s OK because when has the White House ever lied people into war?

This man doesn’t exist, and if you think he does you’re an enemy of humanity who should apologize for having been born. Likewise him, her, her, him and him. And him and her.

This is the 100% true story of the #SyriaStrikes, and if you support sites like The Corbett Report that question it in any way you are a moonbeam fake news tyrant-loving hippy pinko Russian agent and should commit ritual suicide immediately.

If you love your country and/or liberty, NASCAR, supermodels, TV, water slides or your mother you will not question this story in any way. Ever.

This message has been brought to you by the Friends of the Brookings Institute, Raytheon, Genie Oil, Oded Yinon, I-CIA-SIS and The New York Times.


donderdag 6 april 2017

Was de aanslag in Londen op 22 maart 2017 een hoax?

Ole Dammegard denkt van wel en vertelt hierover honderduit in een interview dat Nederlands is ondertiteld. Denk ervan wat u wilt, maar als u commentaar geeft dan zie ik graag dat dit inhoudelijk is. Deze man is voor mij niet nieuw, hij houdt zich al even bezig met deze materie. Ondanks dat ik het niet altijd eens ben met zijn boodschap of conclusies zijn veel van zijn punten niet te weerleggen. Op mijn blog deel ik niet graag dergelijk complot materiaal, maar ten behoeve van debat deel ik dit toch. Dus als u denkt dat Dammegard hier helemaal fout zit, brand los en laat het inhoudelijke commentaar maar komen, ik kijk er naar uit!

Met dank aan Coöperatie De Vrije Media.

Ole Dammegård over de aanslag in Londen from Coöperatie De Vrije Media u.a. on Vimeo.

dinsdag 31 januari 2017

Will David Seaman rectify his repeated Pizzagate metadata-claim?

Trust but verify

David Seaman is one of the few online reporters on the subject of Pizzagate. He can be found on several platforms and publishes regularly. I follow him on his YouTube Channel. He is vocal and offensive but he sometimes claims stuff that can't be verified. We have to trust him on this.
To be clear, I am glad Seaman stays vocal on Pizzagate. As long as nothing has been debunked (contrary to msm claims) this should not disappear off the radar. But... I do not trust a single soul when it comes to cases of alleged child abuse. I have seen to much nonsense and misinformation to just accept things on "the word" of somebody. A claim has to have tangible evidence to support it, and if not, the claim is of no use. So note that, "of NO use". It is neither true or false.
Let me give an example about his most recent video on Pizzagate. In this video he states several things, but let me focus on two of them:
1. Judd Legum Vs. Brittany Pettibone
2. Homeland Security investigates Pizzagate
Judd Legum Vs. Brittany Pettibone
In the video Seaman Talks about Legum attacking Pettibone via GoFundMe, so she would be hit monetary. He shows a screenshot of the Tweet Legum sent and talks about the GoFundMe page of Pettibone taken down. No matter what you think of this, this is something that we can go verify on our own. You can use a search engine to find out who these people are and what their connections are. Then you could go to Twitter and try to find out if this narrative was really the case. And I think one specific tweet from Legum sums it all up, yes it happened. So now you can go and make up your mind what you think of this. 

Homeland Security investigates Pizzagate
In the video Seaman talks about Homeland Security that is "allegedly" active on the Pizzagate case, as he has stated before. Just like he stated the FBI was on the case, something that has been claimed by Ryan O'Neal as well. This on the contrary to Legum Vs. Pettibone can not be verified on our own. When I asked both Seaman and O'Neal if there are any sources to back up this claim, I got no response.
This means we have to go on the word of somebody, in this case 1 or 2 persons. But as long as I can not verify this in any way, it is of no value. Again, I can not say the claim is untrue, I just can't give ANY value to it, both positive and negative.
Next to the lack of verifiable evidence for these claims, I just have a hard time to believe ANY government agency would act on Pizzagate. I gave my personal perception on Pizzagate and the broader implications in a 2-part video series earlier. (Part 1 & Part 2) In this I talked about the phenomenon of Sexpionage and pedophilia being a useful tool in the process. Since this is an extensive talk, with lots and lots of information in it, the subject of Sexpionage got delved under the rest of the information. So I made a separate video on the subject. I have tried to get this subject, and specifically the extensive research of Sibel Edmonds on Dennis Hastert, to the attention of David Seaman on both Twitter and YouTube, but I never got a response.
The point in short is the following: Secret Services combined spy on EVERYBODY, no exceptions. So all communications between, for example, James Alefantis and David Brock can be searched in no time. Not just email, but all other communication as well. So... it should not be a problem of any kind to filter the communications of people suspected of being involved in Pizzagate, and even broader than that. But... We don't see that happening while Pizzagate has been going on for months now... And when even the hundreds and hundreds of Pentagon employees get of the hook, while downloading child pornography or having it on their computers... Why on earth would they dig into Pizzagate, possibly the biggest scandal in global political history?!
I really need more credible evidence to back up the claim DHS is on the case, because extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. The mere word of David Seaman is just not enough. This does not mean what he stated is Untrue, it just has no supporting evidence to prove it is true, so it had NO value at all.
In recent weeks there was big excitement because a Pizzagate researcher called Ryan Alexander O'Neal claimed he was being death threatened by James Alefantis, one of the main characters in the Pizzagate scandal. To be clear again, I have seen no evidence this was actually the case. I have seen text messages, a phone number check and even a screen recording of Ryan trying to prove his Facebook contact with Alefantis. Even if it was all done with the best intentions, there was no solid proof this narrative actually took place. This does not mean O'Neal is a fraud or lying, there is just NO value to this story, until he has supporting evidence.
David Seaman has been talking about Ryan allegedly being death threatened by Alefantis in several of his videos. The word "allegedly" is used lots of times by Seaman, but when he leaves this critical word out, things are presented as being a fact. When he makes such claims, he should have tangible solid evidence to back it up. So when we listen to what Seaman has to say about Ryan something peculiar can be noted...
Seaman claims on several occasions the researcher that was threatened by Alefantis was at that time extracting the "Metadata" from the pictures of the Instagram account of Jimmy Comet, a.k.a. James Alefantis. Metadata is potentially very useful. The date the photo was taken can be found this way, or the geographic location where the photo was taken.
This claim, researchers extracting metadata for Pizzagate pictures was new to me, and since he kept repeating this, I wondered if there was any truth to it. Since I never ever got one response from Seaman on one of my attempts to connect to him, I was not under the illusion he would answer me this time on my questions about the Metadata, perhaps I even asked about it 1 time before... But I asked Ryan about it on YouTube and no answer as well from O'Neal...
So again on this claim: No tangible solid evidence to back up the claim? -> Claim is of NO value...
And just as with the Homeland Security claim there are more remarks to be made about this claim besides the lack of supporting evidence. It is essential when you want to extract metadata form pictures to have the original photos. So when you claim people are extracting metadata for Jimmy Comet his Instagram pictures, the original photos is what should be worked with. But to my best knowledge these photos are not commonly floating around the web, if they exist at all. The most common thing we encounter are screenshots of this Instagram account or archived pages, no original photos. So what sources would the researchers had to work with? The originals. Are they available? Not to my knowledge. So how could they extract metadata if they don't have the needed sources for this? Quite impossible...
Don't get me wrong, I have no proof these original photos did not exist, so I could not claim the claims of Seaman were inaccurate. I just couldn't give ANY value to his metadata claims.
A clean record 
For any researcher it is important to keep a clean record so he can build up credibility over time. The more evidence to support your claims, the more credible you get. If you don't support claims you loose credibility, so one should be careful what to claim. In this extra sensitive case of Pizzagate it is of utmost importance to keep a clean record, with the least amount of unsupported claims possible.
When you claim something without supporting evidence, and later on it gets debunked, it is important to rectify. Making mistakes is human, nothing wrong with that, as long as you rectify when proven wrong.
David Seaman is proud of his track record and he mentions this regularly during his videos. And recently he claimed he had a clean record when it comes to Pizzagate as well. He states:
"Nothing I said on this YouTube channel over the last couple of months has been factually inaccurate."
As I explained before, if I have no evidence to the contrary of his claim, it indeed is not factually inaccurate. But to be fair, lots of point have not been proven to be accurate either. Until now...
Recently the alleged death threatened Pizzagate researcher Ryan Alexander O'Neal gave an interview with Random Rants of Ryan. The day before the interview I made several remarks on the story of O'Neal, and I had one question about the metadata, as claimed by Seaman. During the interview he did not reply to all of my remarks, although I think it were fair points. He did give an answer about the claim of David Seaman.
In short: Ryan O'Neal states he was NOT extracting metadata from the Pizzagate photos. He had not ever seen this researched before on Voat either. He had never heard of metadata until Seaman mentioned this. That makes the repeated claim of Seaman inaccurate, contrary to his claim. That is not a problem, as long as the author, in this case Seaman, rectifies himself, so he has a clean record again.
Again, it is of utmost importance to rectify, otherwise you will give the opposition a tool to cut you down on that point. When they cut you down on one issue, all other issues you mention will be labeled "FakeNews" as well. This MUST be avoided at any time. It is essential to remove this piece of misinformation out of the bulk of info we have on Pizzagate. Another important reason for him to rectify is so other people do not keep disseminating this inaccurate information till eternity.
Because David Seaman has never responded to any of my attempts reaching out to him, I don't think a simple comment underneath one of his videos will do the trick. But I cant stress often enough how important it is for a top Pizzagate investigator to keep his record clean... So I had to find another way.
I collected all movies in which Seaman made claims about the metadata and the video interview of Ryan with Random Rants of Ryan. I cut out the specific quotes and pasted this all into MovieMaker. I added some screens to it to clarify my point, and to ask my question at Seaman to rectify this specific statement. I uploaded this movie to my YouTube channel and wrote this blog to support the video.
I will post this link underneath his recent and upcoming videos, hopefully reaching him in that way. If people know how to reach him, please do. Not for me, but for David Seaman. It is his track record we are talking about. So please reach out to him so he can rectify and keep his record clean again. Thanks in advance to everybody sharing this information with Seaman.
Hopefully my video is clear and makes the point about the metadata-claims and on Seaman claiming none of his info has been inaccurate. If you have any questions, feel free to ask!

Notes to the sources are:
Example 1

donderdag 1 december 2016

Pizzagate and Sexpionage


The Notes to support this video:

The REAL Hastert Scandal: Pedophilia, Drug Money and Blackmail

Transcript- Hastert Case: How the COINTELPRO II Bucket Turned into a Can of Worms

Nigel West - From A to Z on Sexpionage (PDF)

Sexpionage: The exploitation of sex by Soviet intelligence (David Lewis)

COINTELPRO (a portmanteau derived from COunter INTELligence PROgram)

Pizzagate - Trump will NOT safe the day: Petraeus


Here are the notes that go with the video:

Trump flips, now opposes prosecution for Clinton

Trump Ponders Petraeus for Senior Job (Ray McGovern)

The Sins Of General David Petraeus

Gen. Mark Kimmit, Michael Hastings Lt Col Rick Francona talking Petraeus on Piers Morgan

Pizzagate - The Broader Implications



Here are the links I refer to in my video on Pizzagate and the Broader Implications. This is just me, scratching the surface on this wide range of topics, so please dig deeper and share your links in the comment section. Some links up here are in Dutch language. I hope you undestand, or else use Google translate to get the picture...

I hope the links will help you get a better understanding of the broader picture that should be painted on Pizzagate.

De Grijze Duif Blog
http://degrijzeduif.blogspot.nl/ (Dutch, most of the time I write)
Op goede grond - Nationaal Rapporteur (Corinne Dettmeijer-Vermeulen)
https://www.nationaalrapporteur.nl/Publicaties/Op-goede-grond/index.aspx (Dutch)
Wikileaks Podesta Mails
FBI Pedophile Symbols
Pizzagate Summery
Besta Pizza
Anthony Weiner
Terry Bean
Jeffrey Epstein
Bill Clinton on the Lolita express
Hillary gets child abuser off the hook
John Podesta
Joris Demmink (Dutch)
Joris Demmink - Helsinki Commission - Demmink Trial Washington
Rolodex Affaire (Dutch)
Holthuis - Wabeke - Wooldrik (Dutch)
Piet-Hein Donner (Dutch)
Ivo Opstelten (Dutch)
Thomas vd Ven (Dutch)
Judge Stolk & Koos Hertogs (serial child raper/killer) (Dutch)
Kinderdorp Neerbosch - Popeye Kamper (Dutch)
Robert van der Luitgaarden (Dutch)
Patricia Hewitt UK - "We can't prove seks with children does them harm."
De Groene - Hoe Den Haag de pedo’s vertroetelde (Dutch)
Edward Brongersma (Dutch)
Fake news
Iraq & Rumsfeld

Collin Powell at UN

Yellow cake from Niger

1.000.000 Iraqis dead
Russel Tice
Donald Trump
Michael Hastings
Joe Biggs
This takes a little searching on your part. I cant link directly because he has blocked me...
Michael Krikorian
Gladio B

The power principle

Daniel Ganzer
Franklin cover up John de Camp - Consiracy of Silence
I hope I did not forget a link... ;-)